UK

Termination for Convenience

John Tackaberry QC
April 2002
A paper based on those given at meetings of the Society of Construction Law in Hong Kong on 15th November 2001 and London on 9th December 1998.

The author looks at some questions that arise from termination for convenience clauses. Taking a hypothetical clause as a basis, he asks whether even in the context of a widely worded clause, a court is likely to impose some restraints or limits on the power to determine.

Separability - A Tale of Two Agreements

Ben Ring
April 2002
A paper based on the second prize winning entry in the Hudson Prize Competition 2001 presented to the Society of Construction Law in London on 9th April 2002.

The paper looks at how the UNCITRAL Rules and the law of England and the US have sought to protect the doctrine of separability (that the validity of an arbitration clause does not depend upon the validity of the rest

Damages in the Shadow of a Penalty Clause - Tripping over policy in the Search for Logic and Legal Principle

Adrian Baron
April 2002
A paper based on the first prize winning entry in the Hudson Prize Competition 2001 presented to the Society of Construction Law in London on 9th April 2002.

Where the sum stipulated in a penalty clause is penal, the clause will not be enforced by a court. The author considers whether or not such a

The Use and Development of Mediation Techniques in UK and International Construction Disputes

Keith Brandt

February 2002

A paper given at the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators conference ‘East Greets West: New Opportunities for Dispute esolution’ in Hong Kong on 2nd February 2002.

The paper looks at the use and development of mediation techniques in the context of construction disputes. It puts mediation in the context of recent developments in the UK and looks at some practical issues and problems, the international scene and recent innovations( particularly the ICC AD ules) dispute review boards and partnering.

Concurrent Delay

A paper given at a meeting of the Society of Construction Law in London on 5th February 2002.

The paper discussed the correct approach to contractors’ claims arising out of concurrent delay in the execution of construction projects. It looks at the meaning of the expression ‘concurrent delay’ and the differing approaches to the assessment of claims which have attracted support in the industry, both in the UK and other common law jurisdictions.

Corporate Killing - A New Offence

Bridge Bird & Noy Trounson

February 2002

A paper given at a meeting of the Society of Construction Law in Nottingham on 17th July 2001.

The paper looks at the Government’s proposals (announced in October 2001) to introduce a new offence of corporate killing to hold companies accountable for behaviour for which an individual would be liable to a charge of manslaughter, and at the Government’s plans to revitalise health and safety.